...
Accessible
Data and metadata protocols are open and free
The researcher defines level of access in data repository
Perhaps as part of the “Publishing data in a data repository“ scenario?
Restricted access for sensitive data
Perhaps as part of the “Publishing data in a data repository“ scenario?
Metadata records will remain accessible, even when the data is no longer available (FDP & RDR)
Interoperable
Interoperability aspects of the metadata are addressed by the FDP
RDF, FAIR-compliant vocabularies, including references to other metadata (e.g., PID for organisations [ROR] and people [ORCID])
Data model will be defined
Could be another scenario
Are we talking semantic modelling here? Including triple store etc? That could indeed be another scenario
Reusable
The researcher provides all relevant documentation needed to understand the data, such as the study protocol, data dictionary, syntax etc.
Provides where? (and perhaps to whom?)
The researcher refers to a reuse license in the metadata
Preferably machine-readable
License is in the core metadata schema. We could maybe add it as an example for 3a.
We could even create a scenario about filling in the metadata schema, if relevant?
Part of the scenario could be: she refers to a machine-readable license (not sure how that works/how to do this, so could be interesting)
The researcher complies with community standards
Use or define FAIR Implementation Profile
tbd
Alternative Flow